Poll: Aircraft variant- and subvariant-specific pages?

Stingray · Administrator

Poll: Aircraft variant- and subvariant-specific pages?

Leela25 · Global Moderator

You got support from me. I hate them bunched together in one page It feels too awkward. >.>

Ucon · Member

From my point of view all modification must be on the same page as is main variant

It will be easy to follow the history of Mi-24 tree, for example.

aschiro · Veteran Member - Level 2

I voted no. It would be too convoluted.

Gunship · Senior Member - Level 1

Ucon and aschiro have some good points. Keep the variants in the same pages. The lists are long enough as it is.

Leela25 · Global Moderator

If it clutters up the main lists than there should be variant lists in the main pages linking to the separate pages. This organization sounds more sensible to me.

Stingray · Administrator

Sub-pages within the main pages was my original intention when thinking up this organization method. I probably should've specified that in my initial post.

Pepper · Veteran Member - Level 3

Leela25 wrote:
If it clutters up the main lists than there should be variant lists in the main pages linking to the separate pages. This organization sounds more sensible to me.

This is perfect. I support this option.

fluttercopter · Veteran Member - Level 2

I voted yes on the condition that subpages are listed on variant lists in the aircraft pages, not the main lists.

Leela25 · Global Moderator

Get on it Stingy! What are you waiting for? D you need more votes or something? :o

Stingray · Administrator

I'll get on it when I can. I Have lots of other things to do first.